payday

Are we talking personal growth or portfolio growth?

Stocks that collapse in price were once known as dogs and cats. Brokers started calling them value stocks and were able to peddle them to individuals and mutual fund managers. Unfortunately, value stocks are highly unstable. Many are troubled companies headed for bankruptcy. Others are turning around. In today’s markets, value stocks can quickly become overpriced.

Then value fund managers sell them to growth managers. Investors looking to value stocks for low volatility will not find it. Growth stocks are overpriced stocks that are hyped as having huge earnings potential. Growth investors are gullible sorts who believe a few years of fabulous growth will be repeated for decades. They are willing to pay any price for this dream.

The tech mania of 1999 was an extreme example of this magical thinking. Growth investors convinced themselves that untested Internet companies would take over the American economy in a few years. Tech mania has a long and sad history in stock investing. Tech mania generally ends badly. Railroad stocks got up a full head f steam and then jumped the track in the late 1800s. Electricity plays and auto stocks had huge booms and busts in the early 1900s. Long-term studies show that tech stocks do no better than the overall market. However, they are subject to periods of extreme volatility. Tech stocks, when the mania is on, double and triple in a few months. Then they lose 95 percent of their value in the crash. Tech stocks are for dreamers and speculators, not investors. People who do not mind losing a few thousand dollars for the potential of extreme wealth are comfortable with tech stocks. Investors with low self-esteem, who may throw good money after bad, should stay away from tech stocks and other growth stocks.

Tags: , , , ,

Monday, September 7th, 2009 money advice, real estate, taxes Comments Off

Get professional advice now – it may save you from the Crisis

Currently more and more people are forced to struggle with financial hardship. However, fewer seem to be willing or, perhaps, simply able to contact a financial expert to get a professional advice on their finances that will assist them in such difficult times. I cannot stress it strongly enough how important the need for professional advice regarding finances is now, and believe me, it has never been more crucial than in the times of financial turbulence we are witnessing now.

Because the banking sector is under pressure too, you simply must keep your financial affairs in order and inform your bank about any change in your position. It is quite possible that if you decide to approach a bank in the future, treating is as a last resort, they will just turn you down for some sort of financial repackaging.

All too often people seem to forget that the citizens advice bureau is also available in difficult times and provide free advice and information for those struggling with any type of financial hardship. You might feel the urge to bury your head in the sand in hope that your financial problems will disappear in due course, but unfortunately this will not happen. If you act upon the first symptoms of financial trouble you are more likely to get a favorable result in the long run.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 26th, 2009 Uncategorized Comments Off

Distributions to Shareholders

A profitable company regularly faces three important questions. (1) How much of its free cash flow should it pass on to shareholders? (2) Should it provide this cash to stockholders by raising the dividend or by repurchasing stock? (3) Should it maintain a stable, consistent payment policy, or should it let the payments vary as conditions change?

In this post I will discuss the issues that affect a firm’s cash distribution policy. As we will see, most firms establish a policy that considers their forecasted cash flows and forecasted capital expenditures, and then try to stick to it. The policy can be changed, but this can cause problems because such changes inconvenience the firm’s stockholders and send unintended signals, both of which have negative implications for stock prices. Still, economic circumstances do change, and occasionally such changes require firms to change their dividend policies.

One of the most striking examples of a dividend policy change occurred in May 1994, when FPL Group, a utility holding company whose primary subsidiary is Florida Power & Light, announced a cut in its quarterly dividend from $0.62 per share to $0.42. At the same time, FPL stated that it would buy back 10 million of its common shares over the next three years to bolster its stock price.1 Security analysts called the FPL decision a watershed event for the electric utility industry. FPL saw that its circumstances were changing—its core electric business was moving from a regulated monopoly environment to one of increasing competition, and the new environment required a stronger balance sheet and more financial flexibility than was consistent with a 90 percent payout policy.

What did the market think about FPL’s dividend policy change? The company’s stock price fell by 14 percent the day the announcement was made. In the past, hundreds of dividend cuts followed by sharply lower earnings had conditioned investors to expect the worst when a company reduces its dividend—this is the signaling effect, which is discussed later in the chapter. However, over the next few months, as they understood FPL’s actions better, analysts began to praise the decision and to recommend the stock. As a result, FPL’s stock outperformed the average utility and soon exceeded the preannouncement price.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 26th, 2009 Uncategorized Comments Off

Overview of the Dividend Policy Decision

In practice, dividend policy is not an independent decision—the dividend decision is made jointly with capital structure and capital budgeting decisions. The underlying reason for joining these decisions is asymmetric information, which influences managerial actions in two ways:

  1. In general, managers do not want to issue new common stock. First, new common stock involves issuance costs—commissions, fees, and so on—and those costs can be avoided by using retained earnings to finance equity needs. Second, as we discussed previously, asymmetric information causes investors to view new common stock issues as negative signals and thus lowers expectations regarding the firm’s future prospects. The end result is that the announcement of a new stock issue usually leads to a decrease in the stock price. Considering the total costs involved, including both issuance and asymmetric information costs, managers prefer to use retained earnings as the primary source of new equity.
  2. Dividend changes provide signals about managers’ beliefs as to their firms’ future prospects. Thus, dividend reductions generally have a significant negative effect on a firm’s stock price. Since managers recognize this, they try to set dollar dividends low enough so that there is only a remote chance that the dividend will have to be reduced in the future.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 26th, 2009 Uncategorized Comments Off

Professional advice job offer

Our company is currently looking for smart and motivated employees for the position of a website content provider. The duties involve primarily writing and editing content from the following areas of interest: financial advice, crisis problems, real estates, money management, stock exchange and more. An experience in the field of finances and ecomony is required (possibly a university degree). If you’re interested in this offer please send your CV and application via the contact form available at our website.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 19th, 2009 Uncategorized Comments Off

Largest U.S. savings bank is broke

It is the biggest bank collapse in U.S. history: Washington Mutual Savings Bank is the credit crisis has been. U.S. authorities closed the bank, JP Morgan Chase to prevent a takeover worse.

The rumors about the problems of the savings bank had been undercurrents days, on Thursday evening (local time) was the then bankrupt certainty: Washington Mutual had to adjust their business. The rival JPMorgan Chase takes 1.9 billion U.S. dollars for large parts of the institute, as the U.S. Deposit Protection Fund (FDIC) announced. The customer will operate on Friday but as usual go on. Like many U.S. banks are Washington Mutual losses from the mortgage business to become fatal.

The Notrettung were that the regulator OTS deposits outflows amounting to 16.7 billion U.S. dollars since 15 Preceded by September. Washington Mutual did not have sufficient liquidity available to meet their obligations, the Savings Bank was thus in an unsafe and unsound condition regarding their business transactions found, said the OTS. The Seattle-based institution has the regulatory authorities, has assets of around 307 billion U.S. dollars and deposits amounting to 188 billion U.S. dollars. FDIC-chief Sheila Bair said the Deposit Protection Fund had a quick buyer for Washington Mutual need to find through media reports to reassure frightened customers.

JPMorgan, the bargain hunters

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon met with the acquisition langgehegte the goal of his bank in the western U.S. to a strong force in the broad retail business to make. Four months ago had already JPMorgan also by the financial crisis brought the case to U.S. investment bank Bear Stearns at a bargain price swallowed.

Washington Mutual, with headquarters in Seattle had started as a simple savings bank, with the real estate boom of recent years but their activities especially in the mortgage market. In the wake of the crisis to bad property loans lost the share of the group since the beginning of the year about 80 percent of their value. The struggling bank had reportedly also in investment funds such as Blackstone and Carlyle because of a possible takeover vorgefühlt.

Mixed reactions on Wall Street

The savings bank in mid-employed more than 43 000 employees in more than 2200 branches spread across 15 U.S. states. Last emphasized WaMu thousands of posts and cut the business of house loans radical. Because of their problems was the savings already under tighter government supervision and had exchanged their bosses. Only last week she presented herself for sale. Several banks waved but reportedly from the media.

Alone since the beginning of last week fell to the credit crisis, a series of big U.S. financial houses for victims. The investment bank Lehman Brothers reported part of insolvency and is crushed. Merrill Lynch rescues competitor in the arms of Bank of America. The insurance giant AIG had from the state by a mega-credit before the preserved and stands before the group continued selling parts. In the current year was in the U.S. before WaMu also already a dozen small and medium-sized banks have collapsed.

The rescue action for WaMu has been on Wall Street in initial reactions even at night as ambivalent. The purchase was a sign of the strength of JP Morgan Chase and hence positive for the financial markets. At the same time show the recent Notübernahme but also that the credit crisis is far from ausgestanden was so expert.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Friday, September 26th, 2008 Uncategorized Comments Off

Patronage Websites

The following websites are currently under our patronage:

Tags: , , , , , ,

Friday, September 26th, 2008 Uncategorized Comments Off

Introduction to Professional Advice Blog

Welcome to the professional advice blog! The most important aim of our site is to publish financial information that will be valuable people who are not really experienced in the field of finances. You will be able to find interesting info concerning credit cards, business solutions, real estates and many more. With the little help from our side you should have not problems transforming this knowledge into hard cash. If you have andy questions or doubts please write us an email.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Saturday, September 6th, 2008 Uncategorized Comments Off